Pricing your artwork for gallery sales can feel like walking a tightrope: too low, and you shortchange your value; too high, and you risk pricing yourself out of the market. Add gallery commissions to the equation, and the math (and emotions) can get complicated fast.

I often hear artists ask if there’s a better way than the traditional 50/50 split. Should they ask for a set net payout instead? Can the gallery mark the work up as much as they want—as long as the artist gets their share?

Let’s break it all down: the logic behind the standard, what alternatives exist, and how to approach pricing in a way that protects your reputation and sets you up for sustainable success.

Why the 50/50 Split Has Stuck Around

At first glance, it might seem arbitrary: why should the gallery take half?

But over decades of experimentation and variation, the 50/50 model has emerged as the most widely accepted arrangement—and for good reason. It simplifies everything.

• For the artist: You know exactly how to calculate your take-home amount from any sale.

• For the gallery: It standardizes commissions across dozens (or hundreds) of artists, reducing confusion and administrative overhead.

That simplicity allows everyone to focus on what matters: making and selling art.

Could other arrangements work? Sure. Have they been tried? Many times. But few alternatives have stood the test of time.

What About a Variable Markup Model?

Some artists propose a model where the gallery is guaranteed a minimum commission (even up to 100%), but can mark the work up further—and share any bonus profit with the artist.

Here’s how that might look:

• You want to receive $1,375 from the sale of a piece.

• The gallery is free to price it as high as they’d like.

• If they sell it for more than $2,750 (your price doubled), you split the extra 50/50.

In theory, this creates a win-win: the gallery is incentivized to push for a higher price, and you’re guaranteed your net.

But there are real-world complications:

1. System Disruption

Most galleries have standardized pricing, consignment, and accounting workflows. Asking them to make special arrangements adds friction—especially if they work with dozens of artists.

2. Price Inconsistency Across Markets

If Gallery A is pricing your work at $2,750 and Gallery B lists it for $3,500, it creates confusion—and potential resentment—among buyers who notice. In the internet age, collectors compare prices quickly.

This kind of inconsistency erodes trust, both in your pricing and in your brand. A collector who feels they overpaid is unlikely to return.

3. Dilution of Control

By giving the gallery total control over pricing, you may end up with your work selling for more—or less—than you’d ever intended. That introduces reputational risk.

A Better Approach: Set Your Retail Price Strategically

Instead of reinventing the wheel, focus on refining your own pricing system. Start by defining your net goal—the amount you want to earn from each sale—and build your pricing from there.

Let’s say your target is still $1,375. If you know the gallery takes 50%, you double that and price the piece at $2,750.

But don’t stop there.

Add a buffer to accommodate standard discounts and negotiations. Most galleries will occasionally offer 10–15% off to close a sale. If you set your retail at exactly double your net, you’re eating that discount entirely.

A safer model might look like this:

• Desired net: $1,375

• Add buffer: 20%

• Final retail price: ~$3,300

Now, even if a discount is offered, you’re not dipping below your intended net.

When You Want to Propose Something Different

If you still want to try a non-standard arrangement with a gallery, go into the conversation understanding the likely resistance.

Here are a few tips:

• Be clear and professional. Avoid vague language. Present your proposal in writing and be ready to explain how it would work logistically.

• Acknowledge the gallery’s perspective. Make it clear you understand they need to maintain consistency in pricing and process.

• Frame it as a pilot. Rather than pushing for a complete change, offer to try the new approach on a limited basis and evaluate the results.

• Be flexible. If the gallery hesitates, don’t push too hard. Most would rather walk away from a complex arrangement than overhaul how they do business.

Remember, while creativity fuels your art, consistency builds your business.

Final Thought: Pricing Reflects More Than Math

Pricing isn’t just numbers—it’s perception. It sends a message to your collectors, your galleries, and your fellow artists. Whether you stick with the 50/50 model or test alternatives, your pricing strategy should always protect your reputation, support your income goals, and make it easy for others to do business with you.

You’re in this for the long game. Consistency, clarity, and professionalism will take you further than squeezing every last dollar out of a single sale.

Have you experimented with pricing strategies that buck the 50/50 standard? What’s worked—and what hasn’t? I’d love to hear your experience.